A cloud computing platform provides on-demand access to computing resources like servers, storage, databases, and networking over the Internet, following a pay-as-you-go model. This eliminates the need for massive upfront investments in physical hardware and allows for unparalleled scalability and agility.
In this article, we’ll discuss the uses and applications of cloud computing platforms. We’ll also discuss about the three major cloud computing platform providers: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure (Azure), and Google Cloud, which among them offers the most generous free tier for new users, which of them generally is considered to have the lowest raw compute pricing, if automatic sustained-use discounts make a cloud computing platform cheaper in the long run, and a comparison of the features, benefits, and cons of AWS vs. Azure vs. Google Cloud.
Uses and Applications of a Cloud Computing Platform
- Scalability and flexibility: You can rapidly scale up or down your resources (compute, storage, network) as demand changes.
- Cost efficiency: Paying only for what you use (the “utility computing” model) rather than large upfront capital investments in hardware.
- Global reach and availability: Cloud platforms offer datacenters/regions globally, enabling distributed applications and lower latency for end-users.
- Innovation and advanced services: Beyond basic compute/storage, modern clouds provide managed databases, machine learning, analytics, serverless computing, containers and hybrid/multi-cloud solutions.
The Big Three Cloud Computing Platform Providers
The current cloud computing platform provider market is dominated by these three key players:
* Amazon Web Services (AWS) – the pioneer and market leader with the most extensive catalog of services.
* Microsoft Azure – a strong enterprise contender known for its seamless integration with Microsoft software like Windows Server and Office 365.
* Google Cloud Platform (GCP) – well known for its strengths in open-source technologies, machine learning, and data analysis.
Which of AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Offer the Most Generous Free Tier for New Users?
When evaluating the “most generous free tier” among the three, it helps to consider what each provider offers to new users, both in terms of free credit/trial period and always-free services.
*AWS offers a free tier where new customers can get up to US$200 in credits (in certain offers), plus several “Always Free” services.
* Google Cloud provides US$300 in free credit for new customers and more than 20 products with “Always Free” usage beyond the trial.
* Azure offers a free trial (for example US$200 credit) for new users and some services free for 12 months plus some always-free services.
In terms of generosity of the free tier, Google Cloud’s US$300 free credit plus always free offerings look especially strong. However, “most generous” depends on which services you plan to use, region, and limitations. Therefore, from a big three cloud provider comparison, Google Cloud arguably leads for free credits/new user trial, but AWS and Azure have strong offerings too.
Thus for “AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud cost” considerations at the entry level, if you’re focused on exploring without cost, then Google Cloud may be marginally ahead for free-tier generosity.
Which of AWS, Azure and Google Cloud is Generally Considered to Have the Lowest Raw Compute Pricing?
When comparing raw compute pricing (on-demand virtual machines/instances) across AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, the comparison between them is more complex.
* Some comparisons show that AWS tends to offer the lowest pricing for on-demand compute in many cases. For example: “for savings plans with a one-year commitment, AWS generally offers the lowest prices compared to Azure and GCP.”
* Other analyses indicate that Azure may offer lower pricing in certain regions/storage scenarios. For example, one article found that for storage, Azure was more cost-effective, though compute might differ.
* Other online sites portray AWS more favorably. For instance, the Medium blog stated: “AWS offers competitive pricing. Azure is slightly more expensive. Google Cloud tends to have higher pricing, particularly for compute-optimized instances.”
In short: while there is no single “lowest for everything”, the empirical data in many cases suggests that AWS is often the cheapest cloud provider for raw on-demand compute when directly comparing across the big three, though actual pricing depends heavily on region, machine type, commitments, and workload. Therefore, in terms of “AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud cost”, AWS often wins for raw compute, with Azure and Google Cloud sometimes slightly higher.
Do Automatic Sustained Use Discounts Make a Cloud Computing Platform Cheaper in the Long Run?
The concept of “sustained use discounts” is particularly relevant when workloads are continuous or long-running rather than short‐lived bursts. The factors to consider are:
* On Google Cloud, sustained use discounts (SUDs) are automatic, applied when eligible compute resources are used for a significant portion of the month, and can reach up to 30% off for certain machine types.
* The benefit: If you run a virtual machine almost every month, you get larger discounts without needing to commit ahead of time; hence sustained-use discounts can meaningfully reduce cost for long-running workloads.
* However, you must weigh whether the workload qualifies (eligible machine types), whether other discount programs (like committed use or reserved instances) provide deeper savings, and the complexity of managing multi-year commitments.
In summary: For platforms that offer automatic sustained-use discounts, these schemes can make the provider cheaper in the long run, particularly for stable, long-running workloads. For the big three cloud provider comparison, Google Cloud’s SUDs are a strong differentiator. However, you must still consider overall costs including storage, data transfer, support, and region.
Thus, when comparing “cheapest cloud provider” for long-term usage, factoring in sustained-use discounts tilts the balance in favor of Google Cloud for specific workloads, but you must always cross-check with your usage patterns.
Features, Benefits, and Cons: The Big Three Cloud Provider Comparison
A thorough big three cloud provider comparison must look beyond just price:
1. AWS:
* Features and Benefits: The most mature and extensive service portfolio (over 200 services). Unmatched ecosystem, community support, and global infrastructure. The de-facto standard for many enterprises, offering unparalleled depth and flexibility.
* Cons: The vastness can be overwhelming. Billing and cost management can become complex (though tools like Cost Explorer are robust). Can be more expensive for on-demand compute compared to Google.
2. Azure:
* Features and Benefits: Best-in-class hybrid cloud capabilities with Azure Arc and deep, native integration with the Microsoft software stack (Active Directory, SQL Server, Office 365). A strong choice for Windows-based environments and enterprises heavily invested in Microsoft technologies.
* Cons: The user interface and documentation are sometimes considered less intuitive than competitors. While improving, its service portfolio, especially open source, was historically seen as playing catch-up to AWS.
3. Google Cloud:
* Features and Benefits: A leader in open-source, data analytics (BigQuery), container management (GKE), and AI/ML (TensorFlow). Renowned for its clean, developer-friendly interface and advanced data-centric services. Offers a very straightforward and competitive pricing model.
* Cons: Smaller market share compared to AWS and Azure can mean a less mature enterprise ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations. Support and enterprise reputation are strong but still catching up to the other two.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud: Which is the Best Provider?
The debate over AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud cost and features does not have a single winner. To summarize, we’ve concluded that you should choose:
* AWS for its unmatched breadth of services, market maturity, and robust free tier for extended learning.
* Azure if your organization is a "Microsoft shop" requiring seamless hybrid cloud integration and Windows-based solutions.
* Google Cloud for data-intensive, containerized, or AI-driven workloads, and if you prioritize low, transparent compute pricing with automatic discounts.
However, the best choice is entirely dependent on your specific needs. Ultimately, the most cost-effective strategy often involves a multi-cloud approach, leveraging the unique strengths of each provider. You should carefully evaluate your workload requirements, budget constraints, and in-house expertise to select the platform that offers the best value for your project.
Empower Your Cloud Journey with ServerHub’s VPS Solutions
Experience the flexibility and power of a true cloud-computing platform with ServerHub’s VPS solutions. Built on high-performance virtual private servers with SSD caching, instant virtualization deployment and scalable resources, we give you the agility to scale your infrastructure on-the-fly without any downtime.
With deployment starting at just $5/month and backed by a robust 10 Gbps network link, you’re empowered to host websites, apps or data-heavy workloads with confidence. Whether you’re running an e-commerce platform, a container-based application or a complex service, ServerHub bridges the gap between traditional hosting and full cloud platforms, delivering both performance and value. Contact us now to get started and let our hosting experts help you choose the right VPS plan for your needs.
